Issue FOCUS:  
  CHEMICALS &ADDITIVES  
   

Using calculations with equivalent steam pressures versus average steam pressures may more accurately predict drying rate changes


By BOB PERRAULT

Alternative Method Ensures More Reliable Drying Capacity Factors

    Traditionally, papermakers have used average steam pressures to generate drying rate curves, but these are very inaccurate and cannot be used to make any accurate predictions for drying rate changes. Drying capacity factors are required by papermakers to establish equivalent steam pressures, and these equivalent steam pressures are then used to make accurate drying rate calculations.

A MORE RELIABLE METHOD. Drying rate curves, based on data gathered from dozens of machines, cannot be used to predict drying rates on any one machine. The chances of any machine matching the line drawn for the average of all the machines plotted on drying rate curves is one in one hundred. The chance of a machine having the same slope and level of drying as the average line for all the machines plotted is very low.

Thus, using drying rate curves can produce very poor results in predicting drying increase with increasing pressure and the resulting production increase. Drying rate curves should never be used except in a very broad sense to see how machines vary from average machines making similar grades in the industry.

The reason that drying capacity factors very accurately predict changes in drying and production is because they use the actual, existing conditions on each machine. Each machine is different, with each having its own set of drying systems.

Variables for each machine include type of pulp, cooking method, bleaching method, refining, dryer conditions, steam pressure, felt tension, pocket humidity, and numerous other conditions. To make accurate predictions for a machine, all these existing conditions must be factored in. By doing this, a point on the curve shown in Figure 1 can be established. By utilizing all the machine conditions, the exact slope of the machine and the exact level of drying for that machine can be established. Then, by using the drying capacity factors, it is possible to move along the curve in Figure 1.

The curve in Figure 1 is difficult to interpolate.

FIGURE 1: A typical drying capacity factor curve shows DCFs as a result of dryer pressure changes and/or addition and deletion of dryers.

Table 1 reflects the data from the curve in increments of 1 psig. Instead of the curve, we can use the table to develop the numbers and make the calculations. This is a typical drying capacity factor curve. Each grade of paper or board has its own drying capacity factor curve. Curves are a result of data from hundreds of machines making the same grades (or as many machines available) conditioned by the weighted temperature value of steam as the pressure increases.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS. The ability to accurately predict a production increase or decrease as a result of increasing or decreasing the dryer pressure—or adding or removing the number of dryers—is very important. To do this, knowledge of the equivalent steam pressure on a machine is needed, not the average steam pressure. Using the data in Table 1, it is possible to perform the following sample calculations.

The conclusion from this calculation is that a 10 psig increase at lower equivalent pressure is worth considerably more in drying capacity and resulting production than a 10 psig increase at higher pressures. This example should make very clear the need to use equivalent steam pressures and drying capacity factors

 

Example 1: Calculate and compare average and equivalent steam pressures.
If there are 10 dryers at 20 psig and 10 dryers at 80 psig, the average steam pressure is 50psig. What is the equivalent steam pressure using the drying capacity factors in Table 1?

10 dryers x 13.696 (DCF for 20 psig) = 136.96 10 dryers x 18.874 (DCF for 80 psig) = 188.74 TOTAL DCF = 325.70 325.7 ÷ 20 = 16.285 DCF per dryer. 16.285 equals about 44 psig equivalent steam pressure (from Table 1).

 

Table 1:Typical drying capacity factor table of data, providing equivalent steam pressures.
Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF Equiv Psig= DCF
-14 1.115 11 12.336 36 15.531 61 17.627 86 19.226 111 20.537 136 21.655
-13 3.059 12 12.504 37 15.629 62 17.699 87 19.284 112 20.585 137 21.696
-12 4.288 13 12.668 38 15.726 63 17.770 88 19.340 113 20.632 138 21.738
-11 5.206 14 12.827 39 15.822 64 17.839 89 19.396 114 20.680 139 21.779
-10 5.946 15 12.981 40 15.915 65 17.909 90 19.452 115 20.727 140 21.819
-9 6.571 16 13.132 41 16.008 66 17.977 91 19.507 116 20.773 141 21.861
-8 27.113 17 13.278 42 16.099 67 18.046 92 19.562 117 20.819 142 21.901
-7 7.593 18 13.421 43 16.189 68 18.113 93 19.617 118 20.866 143 21.942
-6 8.026 19 13.560 44 16.278 69 18.179 94 19.671 119 20.912 144 21.981
-5 8.420 20 13.696 45 16.366 70 18.246 95 19.725 120 20.958 145 22.021
-4 8.782 21 13.829 46 16.452 71 18.311 96 19.778 121 21.003 146 22.061
-3 9.118 22 13.959 47 16.537 72 18.376 97 19.832 122 21.049 147 22.101
-2 9.431 23 14.086 48 16.620 73 18.440 98 19.884 123 21.093 148 22.140
-1 9.725 24 14.210 49 16.703 74 18.504 99 19.936 124 21.138 149 22.180
0 10.002 25 14.332 50 16.786 75 18.567 100 19.988 125 21.182 150 22.219
1 10.265 26 14.451 51 16.867 76 18.630 101 20.040 126 21.226 151 22.257
2 10.514 27 14.569 52 16.947 77 18.691 102 20.091 127 21.270 152 22.296
3 10.751 28 14.683 53 17.026 78 18.753 103 20.141 128 21.314 153 22.334
4 10.977 29 14.796 54 17.104 79 18.813 104 20.192 129 21.357 154 22.373
5 11.195 30 14.907 55 17.181 80 18.874 105 20.242 130 21.401 155 22.411
6 11.403 31 15.015 56 17.258 81 18.934 106 20.292 131 21.443 156 22.448
7 11.603 32 15.121 57 17.334 82 18.993 107 20.342 132 21.486 157 22.486
8 11.796 33 15.227 58 17.408 83 19.052 108 20.391 133 21.529 158 22.524
9 11.982 34 15.330 59 17.481 84 19.110 109 20.439 134 21.571 159 22.561
10 12.162 35 15.431 60 17.555 85 19.169 110 20.488 135 21.613 160 22.599

 

Example 2: What is the drying or production increase potential when going from 10 to 20 psig, compared with going from 110 to 120 psig? In going from 10 to 20 equivalent psig:

13.696 (DCF for 20 psig) - 12.162 (DCF for 10 psig) = 1.534 1.534 / 12.162 = .126 or 12.6% increase in drying capacity or production
20.958 (DCF for 120 psig) - 20.488 (DCF for 110 psig) = 0.470 0.470 / 20.488 = .0229 or 2.29% increase in drying capacity or production

 

The conclusion from this calculation is that a 10 psig increase at lower equivalent pressure is worth considerably more in drying capacity and resulting production than a 10 psig increase at higher pressures. This example should make very clear the need to use equivalent steam pressures and drying capacity factors

This calculation indicates that the drying on this machine is like having 44 psig in all the dryers, instead of 50 psig in all the dryers. On drying rate curves, this point should be placed at 44 psig. The same calculation can be done for all the various pressure combinations and dryers on a paper machine. The 44 psig is then the equivalent steam pressure on which accurate evaporation rates and production calculations can be based.

 

Example 3: Calculate the potential production increase for adding four dryers to a machine.
The initial conditions include twenty dryers operating at 30 psig and thirty dryers operating at 75 psig. The four dryers will be added to the group operating at 75 psig. Converting to drying capacity factors for the initial conditions:

20 dryers at 30 psig = 20 x 14.907 (DCF for 30 psig) = 298.14 30 dryers at 75 psig = 30 x 18.567 DCF for 75 psig) = 557.01
Total initial DCF = 855.15
Adding 4 dryers at 75 psig = 4 x 18.567 = 74.268
Increase in drying capacity is 855.15 + 74.268/855.15 = 1.087
Increase in production for the addition of these four dryers is 8.7%

Based on this calculation, an increase in drying capacity is equal to a production increase. The same calculation can be done if dryers are being removed from a machine.

 

Example 4: Calculate the production increase possible by re-rating 75 psig dryers up to 100 psig.
The original machine conditions include five dryers at 10 psig, fifteen dryers at 40 psig, and thirty dryers at 75 psig. The first two sections of 5 and 15 dryers will have to continue to operate at their present conditions because of quality issues. An increase in pressure to 100 psig from 75 psig will be permitted in the last group of 30 dryers. Using the DCF for the initial conditions:

5 dryers at 10 psig = 5 x 12.162 = 60.81 15 dryers at 40 psig = 15 x 15.915 = 238.73 30 dryers at 75 psig = 30 x 18.567 = 557.01 Total original DCF = 856.55
Increasing the group of 30 dryers from 75 to 100 psig: 5 dryers at 10 psig = 5 x 12.162 = 60.81 15 dryers at 40 psig = 15 x 15.915 = 238.73 30 dryers at 100 psig = 30 x 19.988 = 599.64 Total new conditions DCF = 899.18
Increase in production potential is 899.18/856.55 = 1.05 = 5.0%

BOB PERRAULT is president of Perrault Drying Systems, Newman, Ga. He can be contacted at bobperrault@mindspring.com

Pulp & Paper Magazine, April 2000 CONTENTS
Columns Departments Focus/Features News
From the Editors News of people Information Systems Month in Stats
Maintenance Management Conference Calendar Pulping Technology Grade Profile
Chemical Markets Product Showcase Calculating Drying News Scan
Comment Supplier News Poised for Expansion
  Mill Operations North America's five-year outlook  
       

Find out if you qualify for a free subscription to the print edition of Pulp & Paper magazine.